TellWorldAI World Archive

Home›Papers

Papers

Papers

Papers that changed AI, with a plain-language explainer for each.

Total 46 · Clear filters

  1. 2026

    GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering

    arXiv

    Zhipu's GLM-5 report describes a 744-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model built on sparse attention and asynchronous reinforcement learning, aimed at moving AI-assisted programming from vibe coding toward agentic engineering.

    Large language modelsChinaAgents & tool use

  2. 2026

    Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces

    arXiv

    Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a curated benchmark of 89 hard tasks carried out in computer terminal environments, built to measure how well AI agents handle realistic command-line work; frontier models and agents score below 65% on it.

    Research historyAgents & tool useCode

  3. 2025

    Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence

    arXiv

    Kimi K2 is Moonshot AI's trillion-parameter mixture-of-experts model, pre-trained with the MuonClip optimizer and post-trained on large-scale agentic data plus reinforcement learning; the report reports state-of-the-art results among open-source non-thinking models and releases base and post-trained checkpoints.

    Large language modelsOpen sourceChina

  4. 2025

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

    arXiv

    The Gemini 2.5 technical report, submitted to arXiv on 7 July 2025, documents Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and 2.5 Flash models: their reasoning, long-context video handling, and cost-versus-capability positioning.

    Large language modelsFoundation modelsMultimodal

  5. 2025

    ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systems

    arXiv

    A 2025 paper introducing ARC-AGI-2, a benchmark of input-output puzzle tasks built to measure abstract reasoning in frontier AI systems, with human testing as a baseline and a task set designed to give a more granular signal of progress.

    Research historyReasoningSimulation

  6. 2025

    Qwen3 Technical Report

    arXiv

    The Qwen3 Technical Report presents Alibaba's Qwen3 family of dense and mixture-of-experts language models, which unify thinking and non-thinking modes, add a controllable thinking budget, and are released under the Apache 2.0 licence.

    Large language modelsOpen sourceChina

  7. 2025

    Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data

    arXiv

    A 2025 paper proposing Absolute Zero, a reinforcement-learning paradigm in which one model writes its own code-reasoning tasks and then solves them, with a code executor as the only judge, reaching state of the art on coding and maths without external training data.

    Research historyOpen sourceDeep learning

  8. 2025

    s1: Simple test-time scaling

    arXiv

    A paper showing that a 32B model fine-tuned on 1,000 carefully chosen questions and run with a simple "budget forcing" trick can beat o1-preview on competition maths by up to 27%, with model, data and code released.

    Large language modelsResearch historyDeep learning

  9. 2025

    Humanity's Last Exam (HLE)

    arXiv

    Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a 2,500-question, multi-modal benchmark spanning dozens of academic subjects, built by experts worldwide so that frontier language models can still be measured after saturating older tests.

    Research historyMultimodalReasoning

  10. 2025

    DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    arXiv

    The DeepSeek-R1 report described how a reasoning model was trained largely with reinforcement learning, rewarding correct answers, and reached performance comparable to OpenAI's o1 on math, code and reasoning benchmarks. Its weights were released openly.

    Large language modelsOpen sourceChina

  11. 2024

    FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI

    arXiv

    FrontierMath is a benchmark of hundreds of original, unpublished mathematics problems written and vetted by expert mathematicians, introduced by Epoch AI to test advanced mathematical reasoning in AI. At release, state-of-the-art models solved under 2% of the problems.[^1][^2]

    Research historyReasoningScience

  12. 2024

    τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains

    arXiv

    τ-bench is a benchmark, submitted to arXiv in June 2024, that tests language agents in dynamic conversations with a simulated user, with domain-specific API tools and policy rules, and scores them by database state rather than by the text of their replies.

    Large language modelsResearch historyAgents & tool use

  13. 2024

    MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark

    arXiv

    MMLU-Pro is a 2024 benchmark that makes the widely used MMLU knowledge test harder: its questions are reasoning-focused and each has ten answer options instead of four.

    Large language modelsResearch historyReasoning

  14. 2024

    OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments

    arXiv

    OSWorld is a benchmark and environment for testing multimodal agents on 369 real computer tasks in Ubuntu, Windows and macOS; humans complete over 72.36% of the tasks, while the best model reaches only 12.24%.

    Research historyAgents & tool useMultimodal

  15. 2024

    LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code

    arXiv

    A benchmark for code LLMs that keeps collecting fresh contest problems from LeetCode, AtCoder and CodeForces, so that scores reflect ability rather than memorised test data, and that also tests code repair and execution reasoning.

    Large language modelsResearch historyData & datasets

  16. 2023

    GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants

    arXiv

    GAIA is a benchmark of real-world questions that are easy for humans but hard for AI assistants, testing reasoning, multimodality, web browsing, and tool use. It compares AI progress against average human performance.

    Research historyAgents & tool useMultimodal

  17. 2023

    GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark

    arXiv

    GPQA is a benchmark of 448 expert-written multiple-choice questions in biology, physics and chemistry, built so that skilled non-experts cannot look the answers up, and hard enough that the strongest GPT-4 baseline scored 39% while domain experts reached 65%.

    Research historyReasoningScience

  18. 2023

    SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?

    arXiv

    A benchmark of 2,294 real software engineering problems taken from GitHub issues and the pull requests that resolved them, in which a model must edit a codebase to fix an issue; on release the best model solved under 2% of them.

    Research historyAgents & tool useData & datasets

  19. 2023

    WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents

    arXiv

    WebArena is a reproducible environment of four fully functional websites — e-commerce, a social forum, collaborative software development and content management — built for testing language-guided web agents. Its best GPT-4 agent completed 14.41% of tasks; humans completed 78.24%.[^1]

    Research historyAgents & tool useMultimodal

  20. 2023

    Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4

    arXiv

    A March 2023 paper by Microsoft researchers testing an early GPT-4, arguing it shows strikingly general, near-human performance across many domains and could be seen as an early but incomplete step toward AGI.

    Large language modelsResearch historyReasoning