Home›Papers
Papers
Papers
Papers that changed AI, with a plain-language explainer for each.
Total 76 · Clear filters
- 2026
GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering
arXiv
Zhipu's GLM-5 report describes a 744-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model built on sparse attention and asynchronous reinforcement learning, aimed at moving AI-assisted programming from vibe coding toward agentic engineering.
- 2026
Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces
arXiv
Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a curated benchmark of 89 hard tasks carried out in computer terminal environments, built to measure how well AI agents handle realistic command-line work; frontier models and agents score below 65% on it.
- 2025
Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities
arXiv
The Gemini 2.5 technical report, submitted to arXiv on 7 July 2025, documents Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro and 2.5 Flash models: their reasoning, long-context video handling, and cost-versus-capability positioning.
- 2025
ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systems
arXiv
A 2025 paper introducing ARC-AGI-2, a benchmark of input-output puzzle tasks built to measure abstract reasoning in frontier AI systems, with human testing as a baseline and a task set designed to give a more granular signal of progress.
- 2025
Qwen3 Technical Report
arXiv
The Qwen3 Technical Report presents Alibaba's Qwen3 family of dense and mixture-of-experts language models, which unify thinking and non-thinking modes, add a controllable thinking budget, and are released under the Apache 2.0 licence.
- 2025
Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data
arXiv
A 2025 paper proposing Absolute Zero, a reinforcement-learning paradigm in which one model writes its own code-reasoning tasks and then solves them, with a code executor as the only judge, reaching state of the art on coding and maths without external training data.
- 2025
s1: Simple test-time scaling
arXiv
A paper showing that a 32B model fine-tuned on 1,000 carefully chosen questions and run with a simple "budget forcing" trick can beat o1-preview on competition maths by up to 27%, with model, data and code released.
- 2025
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE)
arXiv
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a 2,500-question, multi-modal benchmark spanning dozens of academic subjects, built by experts worldwide so that frontier language models can still be measured after saturating older tests.
- 2025
DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
arXiv
The DeepSeek-R1 report described how a reasoning model was trained largely with reinforcement learning, rewarding correct answers, and reached performance comparable to OpenAI's o1 on math, code and reasoning benchmarks. Its weights were released openly.
- 2024
FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AI
arXiv
FrontierMath is a benchmark of hundreds of original, unpublished mathematics problems written and vetted by expert mathematicians, introduced by Epoch AI to test advanced mathematical reasoning in AI. At release, state-of-the-art models solved under 2% of the problems.[^1][^2]
- 2024
SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videos
arXiv
SAM 2 is a Meta FAIR foundation model that segments objects in images and videos from simple prompts such as points, boxes or masks, released together with a large video segmentation dataset and training code.
- 2024
MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark
arXiv
MMLU-Pro is a 2024 benchmark that makes the widely used MMLU knowledge test harder: its questions are reasoning-focused and each has ten answer options instead of four.
- 2024
LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code
arXiv
A benchmark for code LLMs that keeps collecting fresh contest problems from LeetCode, AtCoder and CodeForces, so that scores reflect ability rather than memorised test data, and that also tests code repair and execution reasoning.
- 2023
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants
arXiv
GAIA is a benchmark of real-world questions that are easy for humans but hard for AI assistants, testing reasoning, multimodality, web browsing, and tool use. It compares AI progress against average human performance.
- 2023
GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
arXiv
GPQA is a benchmark of 448 expert-written multiple-choice questions in biology, physics and chemistry, built so that skilled non-experts cannot look the answers up, and hard enough that the strongest GPT-4 baseline scored 39% while domain experts reached 65%.
- 2023
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
arXiv
A benchmark of 2,294 real software engineering problems taken from GitHub issues and the pull requests that resolved them, in which a model must edit a codebase to fix an issue; on release the best model solved under 2% of them.
- 2023
Segment Anything
arXiv 2304.02643
A 2023 paper that introduces the Segment Anything project: a promptable segmentation task, a model, and a dataset of over 1 billion masks on 11 million images, all released to advance foundation models for computer vision.
- 2023
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4
arXiv
A March 2023 paper by Microsoft researchers testing an early GPT-4, arguing it shows strikingly general, near-human performance across many domains and could be seen as an early but incomplete step toward AGI.
- 2022
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
arXiv 2206.07682 (TMLR 2022)
A 2022 paper arguing that some abilities of large language models appear only once models are large enough, and cannot be predicted by extrapolating from smaller models — so further scaling may keep widening what these models can do.
- 2022
Beyond the Imitation Game (BIG-bench)
arXiv
BIG-bench is a large community-built benchmark of 204 tasks designed to test language models on problems believed to lie beyond their current abilities, described in a paper posted in June 2022.